August 15, 2010

Why the news should be “free”

In today’s world of Internet media or publishing, a great debate is being…well, debated on whether or not news outlets should charge for news.

Business wise, charging would be incredibly stupid. You’d lose more than half of your readers in my opinion, which makes the site less marketable for advertising dollars and so on.

Still, as a journalist who reports for the community I was born in, I feel “free news” is a moral issue. A community deserves to know about what it does, what it spends money on and what it stands for.

Here’s my two points in this argument.

  • Most newspaper subscriptions are generally between $10-14 a month. What do they offer that anyone else can’t get without going on their own? Anyone can watch a Chiefs game in person or on TV. Anyone can spend $1 or $2 on gas going to board meetings and observing what they do. Why charge for something anyone can do? It’s morally wrong.
  • Newspapers are among the biggest advocates (and rightfully so) of a “free and open” society and government. Doesn’t a pay-wall morally go against what a newspaper advocates?

Again, business wise charging for news online is downright stupid.

But I think there’s an argument of ethics and morality to it as well, one which isn’t explored too much when this debate comes up.

Part of me thinks the only chance newspapers have of regaining any traction in the new media era (it’s a small chance, too) is if the newspaper is printed as part of a not-for-profit type of arrangement.

That means each house receives a free newspaper in a city that it covers. It’s bold, but it’s different.

Again, it’s a bit of a risk.

But it’s better than nickle-and-diming current subscribers.

August 5, 2010

Unbelievable: Oregon county government cracks down on…..lemonade stands

It’s good to see tax dollars are being used by some local governments to shake-down a 7-year-old girl.

Again, unbelievable:

Turns out that kids’ lemonade stands — those constants of summertime — are supposed to get a permit in Oregon, particularly at big events that happen to be patrolled regularly by county health inspectors.

“I understand the reason behind what they’re doing and it’s a neighborhood event, and they’re trying to generate revenue,” said Jon Kawaguchi, environmental health supervisor for the Multnomah County Health Department. “But we still need to put the public’s health first.”

Julie had become enamored of the idea of having a stand after watching an episode of cartoon pig Olivia running one, said her mother, Maria Fife. The two live in Oregon City, but Fife knew her daughter would get few customers if she set up her stand at home.

August 5, 2010

Zack Greinke: I might as well be done as a Royal

I’ve long been on the “Trade Zack Greinke” bandwagon for a few reasons: We’re not going to win for a while, we could net a king’s ransom for him and we probably won’t sign him to a second major contract.

Greinke realizes some of this too in a very interesting Kansas City Star story.

(Note: The Star is criticized a lot these days – some of it is unfair. But a story like this reminds us the importance of a quality sports page and reporters.)

The money quote:

“There’s no reason for me to get real excited about it,” he said, “because the chance of more than one of them making a major impact by the time my contract is up is pretty slim.”

The full story is here. I definitely recommend reading it.

Shouldn’t this episode increase the size of the “Trade Zack Greinke” bandwagon? It seems pretty clear Greinke isn’t too optimistic about the Royals’ future, one of the very few who isn’t.

He’s done a lot for the Royals, but I think it’s time for this divorce to happen. Make the trade in the offseason.

July 29, 2010

Podcast: The Royals pitching staff sucks; Why Moose, Hosmer overrated for Royals future success; Jeremiah Masoli/K-State and Larry Bird.

Good morning, everyone.

Here’s a mid-week podcast. Topics, as always, below:

1. Introduction 0 – 4:19

2. Why isn’t there more criticism laid at the feat of the Royals coaching staff for the lack of progress and performance on this pitching staff? A look at the staff’s struggles this year compared to last year. 4:20 – 8:25

3. Royals fans should look at five specific prospects before drooling about Mike Moustakas and Eric Hosmer. 8:26 – 11:45

4. The Royals could have anywhere between 16 – 33 million in additional payroll for next year. A few thoughts on where that payroll could go. 11:46 – 19:36

5. Why I lost a little respect for K-State football this week over the Jeremiah Masoli situation. 19:37 – 23:30

6. Although they are rightfully the North’s favorite, Nebraska’s coming into the 2010 season a little overrated. 23:31 – 28:07

7. If Bill Self, Mike Anderson and Frank Martin stay at their respective schools, Kansas City will have one hell of a college basketball city. 28:08 – 31:53

8. Why, over time, Larry Bird’s skin color has cost him a larger place in NBA History. 31:53 – 38:38

9. If you plan out your own birthday plans, lose the arrogance quickly. 38:39 – 41:30

10. End of show.

DOWNLOAD: http://www.fileden.com/files/2010/7/11/2912084//SloanPodcast4.mp3

July 24, 2010

Podcast: The Trade Deadline and Anchorman Edition

As usual, here are the show notes:

0 – 2:30 : Show introduction

2:31 – 11:15 : A discussion on the Alberto Callaspo trade. Also, speculation on a number of Royals continue. Also included in this chunk: Why Zack Greinke should be traded and attendance numbers.

11:16 – 15:55: Why the Missouri Tigers are overrated coming into the college football season.

15:56 – 18:45: Conversely, why I think the Iowa State Cyclones are underrated coming into the Big 12 Conference season.

18:46 – 23:15: Five completely random predictions about the 2010-11 college football season.

23:16 – END: Why Anchorman is the best comedy movie in the past 15-20 years. The show’s conclusion is also included.

Download Link: http://www.fileden.com/files/2010/7/11/2912084//SloanPodcast3.mp3

July 19, 2010

Larry Bird For The Win

Larry Bird said this about LeBron James:

As for the saga that led to the union of James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh in Miami, Bird had mixed feelings.

“That’s why we have free agency,” he told Dakich. “When you get an opportunity to get an open market, anything can happen. I’m like a lot of people. I’d like to have seen LeBron stay in Cleveland but his desire was to go play with some great players and try to win championships. You’ve got to do what’s best for yourself. He’s a very, very talented young man, a great basketball player and he wanted to go play with Wade and Bosh. He had the ability to do that and he did it.

“They’ll be a great team but it’s no guarantee they’re going to win it next year.”

With JMV, Bird broached the topic of the ultimate what-if scenario from his playing days.

“I remember back in my days, I’d rather play against Earvin Johnson than play with him,” he said. “I know he’s a great player and you always want to play with the best but I just loved to compete against him. He’s a guy I always compared myself to. I’d rather stay in Boston and let him stay in L.A. and just compete every year in the Finals. That’s what made me a better player. It would’ve been too easy if we played together.”

Notice how the legends are lining up against LeBron James.

First, it was Michael. Now, it’s Larry.

Magic: You’re up!

Bird and Jordan are right. LeBron has taken the easy way out of things by playing with his talented buddies in South Beach. He had a chance to make himself an argument as the greatest basketball player of all-time.

Not now.

And before LeBron fans say the three guys had talent around them: two big differences.

1. Magic, Jordan and Bird never left their teams.

2. All three guys were primarily responsible for how their teams played.

Early speculation is LeBron might cut down some shooting and time to make way for Wade.

Jordan, Magic and Bird would never have done that either.

July 19, 2010

Just In Case Someone Hasn’t Seen It……

“A doubbbbleee rainbooowwww.”

July 19, 2010

Dwyane Wade Should Probably Stay Quiet

I’m not a politically correct or overly “love America or leave it” type, but this was stupid.

“We’re going to be wearing a bullseye. But that’s what you play for,” Wade said. “We enjoy the bullseye. Plus, there’s going to be times when we lose 2-3 games in a row, and it seems like the world has crashed down. You all are going to make it seem like the World Trade is coming down again, but it’s not going to be nothing but a couple basketball games.

I get the point of the media’s reaction to stories and things like that.

But a regular season NBA game and September 11th are probably not the best two things to compare with each other.

July 18, 2010

Podcast: Soria to the Yankees, why AAU is killing basketball and why college football rules over the NFL

Hey – it’s about 107 degrees outside, so I thought it would be a perfect time to do a podcast.

With high school sports out, there are no topics to discuss on that front. There are some local and national topics worth discussion, however. I selected eight of them for your consideration.

Show notes:

1. Joakim Soria to the Yankees (2:55 – 6:00): Why I think Dayton Moore has a great opportunity at getting two or three decent prospects for Soria and how the Royals have leverage in this trade.

2. The Kansas City Royals 2010 Season….DONE. (6:01 – 7:01)

3. A look at the Royals minor league system. (7:02 – 9:22): The ultimate pessimist is gaining some optimism regarding this franchise’s future. It feels good for once.

4. College Football vs. the NFL (9:23 – 16:38): Five specific and lengthy reasons why NCAA Football is A LOT better than the NFL.

5. How I remember George Steinbrenner (16:40 – 21:04): Note to Yankees fans – don’t listen to this part.

6. AAU basketball is killing the sport (21:05 – 27:06): How AAU basketball is dramatically hurting the sport at all three levels, including two personal examples from my job.

7. Why Notre Dame should join the Big 12. (27:07 – 28:56): There is  case. I make it.

8. Was 2003 bad for the Royals? (28:57 – END): I say yes. Why I think so in this final segment.

Download Link: http://www.fileden.com/files/2010/7/11/2912084/SloanPodcast2.mp3

July 18, 2010

Why Magic Johnson’s The Greatest NBA Player Ever (And Why Bird’s Better Than Jordan)

Magic Johnson

The poster child for most basketball players today is Michael Jordan.

Whenever the next great thing comes along – like Kobe Bryant or LeBron James – he’s compared to Michael Jordan. He’s never called the next Magic Johnson or Larry Bird.

However, let me make my case on why I think Magic was better than Bird, Jordan and the rest. And as a bonus point, why I would take Bird over Jordan.

This is not aimed to disrespect Bird, Jordan or any other player. They left their marks on the game. Somehow, I still think Magic is under-appreciated historically.

Consider these points.

1. Magic could play all five positions. Bird was a better shooter. Jordan was more athletic and could “get up” unlike any other. But none of them could play all five positions like Magic did. Replacing Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in Game 6 of the 1980 NBA Finals, Johnson put up this stat-line: 42 points, 15 rebounds, 7 assists. Jordan or Bird never did that in an NBA Finals. They had “moments” and great games. But Magic’s game that night indicated he could have played all five positions if he wanted too.

2. Magic 138. Bird 59. Jordan 28. That’s how many triple-doubles each of those guys assembled during their careers. That’s more of a duck-tail item to the first bullet point. The 138 number indicates how versatile Magic was. Considering Bird played with Kevin McHale and Robert Parish, that 59 number’s pretty impressive, too.

3. Magic Johnson’s supporting cast was a little overrated. It’s tough to say any supporting cast that included Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was overrated. However, that Jabbar was not “at his peak.” Other than Jabbar, only Jamaal Wilkes (2), Norm Nixon (1) and James Worthy (6) made All Star games in the Magic era. While Byron Scott and Michael Cooper were nice parts, neither were ever all stars. The knock against Magic from many is they consider his supporting cast epic. There was talent, but I think Magic “made” a few of those guys. The West was also significantly weaker than East, making it easier in theory to make the West’s All Star team.

4. Larry Bird’s supporting cast was underrated. In the many “Magic vs. Larry” debates I’ve taken part in over the years, many will contest that Magic had the better team, but Bird was the better player. Magic’s team was clearly talented, but don’t write off those Celtics teams. Robert Parish and Kevin McHale made a combined 16 appearances in the All-Star game while Bird played there. I would take Boston’s interior game over the Lakers seven days of the week. Danny Ainge, Dennis Johnson and Tiny Archibald made appearances in the game. Cedric Maxwell, who averaged 20-10 and 18-9 in two early years with Bird, never made an all star game in the Bird era. Bill Walton also helped those mid-80′s teams off the bench. If those Lakers teams were the most talented ever, Boston in that era was a VERY close second.

5. Michael Jordan’s supporting cast was INCREDIBLY underrated. I’m saving Scottie Pippen for the next point, because there’s so much information on Pippen, it’s worth it. But in Jordan’s title runs, he had some other important pieces, too. Horace Grant nearly averaged a double-double multiple years for Chicago. Bill Cartwright was an all-star before he played in Chicago. B.J. Armstrong, John Paxon and other bench guys were key to those early runs. In the later runs, Chicago only had the sport’s best rebounder in Dennis Rodman, a great defensive guard in Ron Harper, a 6-10 forward in Toni Kukoc who could shoot. Steve Kerr was also a dangerous three-point shooter for those teams. Rodman had won two NBA Defensive Player of the Year awards, too.

6. Scottie Pippen. Pippen peaked during the years Jordan starred in Chicago. Same as McHale and Parish in Boston. Kareem was on the decline during most of Magic’s years. If a pool of the “Big 3′s” supporting cast was assembled for a draft, I would select the 1990s Pippen over anyone else, including Jabbar. Pippen averaged 22-9-6 in 1994. At the time, he was only the second NBA player in history to lead his team in points, rebounds, assists and steals in one year. Pippen was probably the game’s best defensive player at that time (he was better than Jordan, in my opinion). When Jordan retired after the 1993 title, the Bulls only won two less regular season games and had three all stars. I’ve always wondered how Pippen would have done in his prime without Jordan. I’m not suggesting Pippen was better. However, he was very underrated by Bulls fans and those in the NBA.

7. Competitive eras. Wilt Chamberlain and Bill Russell’s competition was limited, although Russell still deserves credit for owning Wilt. Jordan’s Bulls peaked when Bird and Magic retired. They also peaked when the Detroit Pistons under Isiah Thomas got old. Jordan came along at the right time. The 1980s was the best decade in NBA history and Magic thrived during it. Bird did too.

8. Magic, Bird got scalps. Magic’s five titles came against Philadelphia (2), Boston (2) and Detroit (1). Bird’s titles came against Houston (2) and Los Angeles (1). Boston, Philly and Detroit were easily the East’s best three teams and Magic’s Lakers took them down when each franchise was at its best – Philly in the early 1980s, Boston in the mid 1980s and Detroit in the late 1980s. Los Angeles and Houston were the West’s best. Jordan’s Bulls never beat a team in the finals with a dominant center (Shaq’s peak was 1999-2003). Regardless of seeds, I would argue Phoenix in 1993 was the only team that was the West’s best that year. Orlando with Shaq gave Chicago trouble, defeating them in ’95. To be fair, Chicago whipped Orlando in ’96, but I’d be curious to see what a more experienced Shaq and a healthy Penny Hardaway would have done to Chicago in ’97 and ’98. Magic beat the best of the best and Bird did too. However, Magic did it more with his five rings.

9. One more Scottie Pippen stat. Before Pippen was drafted, Jordan was 5-15 in the playoffs. In 1994, without a retired Jordan, the Bulls were 6-4 in the playoffs and was a controversial loss away from knocking off the New York Knicks in the semi-finals. Again, not saying Scottie was better. But he was really, really good.

10. Magic did best at making players around him better. Outside of Kareem, Magic should be credited in advancing the careers of every single Laker. His surrounding cast benefited directly from him. Their scoring averages took a hit when he wasn’t in the lineup. Although Bird deserves credit, Dennis Johnson was an all star outside of Boston and Walton was too. Regarding Jordan, Pippen was probably robbed of being a definite Top 20 player of all time, Rodman was the league’s best defender from ’88-93 and later the best rebounder. Jordan’s supporting cast of Pippen, Rodman, Cartwright and others showed they could play as well (or better) without Jordan. Worthy, Scott, Cooper weren’t the same without Magic and Kareem would only have one ring without Magic.

11. In a four-year span, Magic won a high school, college and NBA title. Jordan and Bird didn’t. Regardless of who was around him, Magic impacted his team at three different levels unlike any other player.

12. Jordan received preferred treatment from officials. This is mostly a gang up on Jordan at this point, but I think this point’s important. During his time with the Chicago Bulls (I’m eliminating the Wizards portion), Jordan averaged 8.72 free throw attempts a game. Magic took about 6.5 free throws a game. Bird averaged 5 attempts. The only advantage Jordan had over Magic and Bird came in scoring. However, if you eliminate free throw’s made per game, Jordan only outscored Bird by four points each year on average, compared to the seven in reality. His margin with Magic would still be 8 points, but not the 11-point advantage it is now.

After doing some research and considering all the points, I’d rank my Top 5 as follows:

1. Magic Johnson: See Above

2. Larry Bird: I thought he played in a tougher era than Michael and Bird brought more to the table.

3. Michael Jordan: A great, great player. I know I sound like a “hater,” as today’s youngsters would say. I just don’t think he was as good as Magic and Bird.

4. Bill Russell: The game’s ultimate winner.

5. Hakeem Olajuwon: The game’s most skilled center ever. Didn’t dominate just because he was fat or taller than anyone else in the league. A great defender and a great athlete for someone who was 7-0.